| Association for Graduate Liberal Studies Conference | Teaching Students with Special Needs | Lessons from Experienced Faculty |
| Stuart
Charmé, Association for
Graduate Liberal
Studies Conference, 6-8 October 2005: The Association for Graduate Liberal Studies Programs held its annual national conference in Minneapolis from October 6-8. The conference included a day-long workshop on the nuts and bolts of teaching classes and running programs in liberal studies as well as a day of presentations related to the conference theme of innovation and creativity. There were several recurring themes that pervaded the conference and which can be generalized to the activity of college teaching as a whole. First, there was a good deal of discussion about the need to be very clear not only about the specific goals of teaching particular classes but also about how success in reaching these goals can be measured. It is common to hear faculty talk about "core competencies" that a program should impart, but it is less obvious how to do pre/post evaluation to see how much mastery of "critical thinking," "sensitivity to diversity and multiculturalism," "college level research and writing skills," or other educational goals has actually occurred. In some schools subject matter specialists team up with instructional design specialists to discuss goals, target audiences, learning outcomes, and evaluation strategies. Second, there was a great deal of discussion about emerging new paradigms for university education, particularly in regard to the issue of interdisciplinarity. The traditional paradigm for university education is over a century old and corresponded to the emergence of the present set of academic disciplines which produced the current university structure of academic majors and minors. Lecture is the primary mode of teaching in this model, based on the transfer of knowledge from experts to novices. Presenters at the conference emphasized the challenges to the traditional paradigm as disciplinary boundaries are weakening and academic methodology increasingly crosses disciplines. In addition, as more knowledge has been developed about the ways that people learn most effectively, alternative strategies that more actively engage the student have developed. Students need to be encouraged and supported to experience the academic process of posing questions and discovering answers rather than just being passive recipients of expert answers. For students in graduate liberal studies programs, this is one of the most exciting parts of their education. |
|
Teaching
Students with Special Needs -- a Teaching Matters Workshop: The Teaching
Matters Program
held its first workshop for the 2005-2006 academic year on Friday,
October
7. The topic of the workshop was “Teaching
Students with Special Needs: Resources, Strategies, and
Responsibilities”, and
we were fortunate to have Patricia Grove, from the Learning Resource
Center in
New Brunswick, and Tom Pignone, from the Learning Resource Center in
Camden, to
lead the workshop. Second,
the relation of institutional obligation and student
needs is different for students in the pre-college educational
environment
(K-12) and in the collegiate environment. Pat
Grove expressed the difference as a contrast between a
guarantee of success
in K-12 education versus a guarantee of access in collegiate
education. That is, students with
special needs in K-12 are given an Individualized Educational Plan
(IEP) and
every effort is made (with some efforts mandated by law) to insure that
the
students succeeds in completing his or her education.
Parents are often very involved in this
process. In contrast, students with
special needs in college must provide evidence to support particular
accommodations of their needs, and effort is only made to provide
access to
educational opportunity. If the student,
given access, does not succeed, no special effort is made to remedy the
lack of
success. Parents, however much they may
wish to be involved, have no legal standing to be involved in this
process. According
to Pat and others at the workshop who have familiarity
with K-12 education, the sharp change in focus between K-12 and
collegiate
education is a difficult transition for many families.
It may also create unusual problems for
instructors in college who encounter students that feel as though they
are
entitled to pass a course, regardless of whether or not the student has
taken
responsibility and complied with the guidelines for the course. |
| Lessons from
Experienced Faculty -- Teaching Matters Workshop The Teaching Matters Program held its second workshop of the 2005-2006 academic year on Friday, November 4. The topic of the workshop was "Lessons from Experienced Faculty;" panelists included Georgia Arbuckle-Keil, Professor of Chemistry; Marie Cornelia, Associate Professor of English and Associate Dean for Graduate Studies; Bob Ryan, Professor of English; and Bill Whitlow, Professor of Psychology and Director of the Teaching Matters Program. The panel discussed several topics, including how their teaching has changed over the course of their careers and their favorite moments in teaching at Rutgers-Camden. They also offered advice for those early in their careers. Bob Ryan reminded the audience that their students don't know, and don't need to know, everything you do. Bill Whitlow added, "they don't need to be experts." The pane's love of teaching shone through the discussion. "They say teaching is like acting," said Bob Ryan, but it's even better. In the theater, the audience doesn't talk back." Marie Cornelia encouraged seeking out opportunities to engage in interdisciplinary teaching. "I've never in my life wanted to be anything but a teacher," she explained. "I love being in the classroom. Each of us tries to convey the excitement that is inherent in our discipline." Georgia Arbuckle advised trying new things and creating new courses, noting "it lets you keep on learning," Added Bill Whitlow, "find delight in being surprised." |